The assignment for our final blog is to do a
comparative analogy of our first week verses our last week of discovering
Myrtle. We are to divulge the epiphanies
and theological interpretations we have discovered on this journey.
When I look back at my initial theological
snapshot, I realize I was just reciting facts, my basic understanding of
Myrtle. I had barely skimmed the surface of the deep waters I was about to dive
into. In my initial assessment, I said
Myrtle was one of the co founders of the Unity Movement. After reading more about Myrtle’s methodology
and theology, I may venture onto a limb here to say that my understanding has
changed. I believe Myrtle was the head
and heart of this organization. If I had not taken this course I don’t know if
I would have known just how much so. I
enjoyed discovering more on Myrtle’s background, her worldviews and her
rational and logical reasoning, which eventually led to the unfoldment of the
Unity Movement.
How was Myrtle so impactful? Myrtle is the one who decided to apply all
the theories she had on healing cells in her body. Myrtle is the one who discovered prayer
worked for her and others came to Myrtle because they recognized the healing
work she was doing and it worked. It was not until Myrtle began to substantiate
her healing abilities that Charles began to pay attention. It was Myrtle who stepped
out in Faith and ventured into the unknown. It was truly Myrtle who began to
understand the way Christ Nature moved in and through us. Myrtle began to shift her thoughts. She was
able to claim knowledge through her Christ Consciousness when she affirmed
Truth first for herself and then for others.
Given the time frame in which Unity began, women
were not as respected as the male gender, therefore I believe that the Unity
Movement gained momentum once Charles jumped on board with Myrtle’s teachings.
I believe that the only way Myrtle’s ideologies/theology would have been heard
would have been for her to prove to others that her beliefs on healing,
affirmations, denials, salvation, regeneration and connecting to source were
true. Once Myrtle had her husband’s
blessing I believe others began to listen. I could be making this all up but
this seems to be rational from my point of view.
Myrtle was passionate about prayer, which I
acknowledged in week one. What I didn’t acknowledge in week one was that Myrtle
lovingly encouraged others to pray not only to God but also as if they were
God. Remember our varying thoughts on
this in week two? Well, my thoughts on
this have changed. Once I began reading more about Myrtle. I believe Myrtle saw
God as both. A God within and a God outside herself. It would seem pretty apparent that at times
we might need to recognize a God outside ourselves because we can do all things
through him who strengthens us.
I believe that Myrtle recognized her God given
faculties in the silence when she would convene with God and become one in
complete recognition and harmony with the source of all that is. I said the
following in week one and I believe this is pretty significant and my views
have not changed on this. “Myrtle described how God’s love continued to bless
her and she was certain that God would bestow that blessing on them as well if
they took the time to enter into the silence, then they would know how great
God’s love for them was.”
Christine, I have enjoyed being in both Dr Tom and Dr. Tanner's classes with you this summer. I also enjoyed being on the radio show with you. And it was who told me about Myrtle's Grove right here at Unity Village.
ReplyDeleteI would agree with you that Myrtle was both the head and heart of the Unity movement. She was the one who first had the experience and the results. And it is interesting how many women are Unity ministers today!
I also think you r observation that Myrtle believed in a God that was both inside and outside of us. The prayer of her's that is up at Myrtle's Grove certainly is a prayer that invokes God.
I have also gained so much from you experiences in Montana this summer regarding native spirituality. And again, Myrtle also was so moved by native spirituality that she saw from her days living in the (what was then0 wild west.
Blessings,
Rick
Christine. I agree, Myrtle was the head and heart of the Unity Movement. Had I not taken this class I would not have known that. There really was so much to learn about her. As I indicated in my blog, my theological snapshot of Myrtle was slightly blurred. Enjoyed being in yet another class with you.
ReplyDeleteHi Christine. Your self-critique reminded me of mine! So much of what you said, I felt. Something you said, ("I believe Myrtle was the head and heart of this organization") is the same conclusion I came to, although I didn't bring it up in my post this week. One thing I have to disagree with is what you said (and Rick reinforced in his comment) is the notion that God is both inside and outside us. To me, that says there is both Oneness and Separation at the same time. While we can feel like there's separation (of course we do that all the time) I don't believe that's the reality. It's more of an error thought. Of course, I'm with you that she said many things that suggest separation between us and God - but I believe that was simply a style of communication. Thanks for a great analysis and for many insights during the course.
ReplyDeleteChristine-
ReplyDeleteIt’s been wonderful sharing the discovery of Myrtle with you this summer. I love how you summed it up and I’m right there with you: Myrtle was indeed the "head and heart" of Unity. I dare say she still is; we just didn’t know to what extent. How cool that we do now--honest, too, to say you were "just reciting facts.” It’s been a good trip to Myrtle. Thank you sharing the journey with me.
See you real soon!
Blessings and blue skies,
Lesley